4th Circuit Rules That Baltimore Warrantless Aerial Surveillance Program Violates the Fourth Amendment

This post was originally published on Epic

Within a opinion from the 4th Circuit en banc , the court turned a prior ruling that will Baltimore’s aerial surveillance system did not violate the Fourth Variation, deciding that, “because the environment (Aerial Investigation Research) plan enables police to consider from the whole of people’s movements, we hold that will accessing its data is really a search, and its warrantless procedure violates the Fourth Amendment. inch The AIR program was a public-private partnership with Persistent Security Systems that flew various surveillance planes above Baltimore capturing detailed video associated with 32 square miles from the city. Using the AIR initial program, Baltimore Police could track individuals movements through the city for up to 12 hrs a day. The pilot system was not renewed at the end of the 6-month term last year. LEGENDARY joined an amicus supporting injured parties petition for re-hearing sobre banc, arguing that below Carpenter v. United states of america the Baltimore Police Department’s ability to monitor individuals with at least 45 times of flight video augmented simply by automated license plate readers systems constituted a search. LEGENDARY filed an amicus within Carpenter v. United States and it has long fought to restrict drone surveillance and other forms of airborne spying.

Leave A Comment

16 − eleven =