Supreme Court Rules Officer’s Improper Access to License Plate Record Does Not Violate Computer Crimes Law

Supreme Court Rules Officer’s Improper Access to License Plate Record Does Not Violate Computer Crimes Law

This post was originally published on Epic

Within today’ s decision within Van Buren sixth is v. United States , the Best Court determined that an officer who improperly accessed this license plate record could not become held liable under a government computer crimes law, the pc Fraud and Abuse Action. EPIC highlighted the severe privacy concerns with federal government employees’ improper access to delicate personal information in government directories in the amicus short we submitted in this case, and several justices echoes these concerns during mouth argument. The outcome of this situation highlights the urgent requirement for comprehensive privacy legislation. We require enforceable rules to prevent incorrect access to and misuse of private information contained in both federal government and private databases.

The Court also failed to resolve what it means for anyone to have “ authorization” to get into a computer or to be “ entitled” to access information within the computer. The Court recommended a general “ gates-up-or-down approach” — meaning an individual possibly has authorization to access the pc or specific information inside the computer or it does not— but explicitly left open up the question whether the prohibitions upon access must be technical or even whether they can be contract-based. The product range of criminalized activities might, in some respects, still be a lot broader than even the Federal government was advocating. Certain site terms of service that will prohibit specific individuals or even groups from accessing the web site may still be enforceable set up individuals have no knowledge of the particular restrictions and the website owners bum else to limit entry. An 18 year-old who have accesses a website restricted to individuals over the age of 21 may break the CFAA, but the police officer who knowingly accesses personal information to stalk plus harass the individual does not.

The Court also failed to clearly answer more complicated entry questions about web scratching, and the Court should offer the pending petition within LinkedIn v. hiQ Labs to resolve these queries. Web scraping involves getting at a computer using a technical technique that is often prohibited with a website’s terms of assistance and also blocked using specialized barriers. EPIC filed a good amicus brief supporting the petition.

Leave A Comment

6 + fourteen =